In \u201cThe Right to a Decent Minimum of Health Care,\u201d Allen Buchanan begins by clarifying what constitutes something as a right. He explains that just because we can agree that people would benefit from having guaranteed healthcare, this doesn\u2019t mean that anybody has a true right to healthcare because there is no solid justice theory supporting the right. In other words, just because something is \u201cgood\u201d doesn\u2019t mean we are necessarily entitled to it.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Buchanan then explains that providing a decent minimum of healthcare can be very attractive, but before determining whether or not this idea should be implemented, people must agree upon what is considered a \u201cdecent minimum\u201d and what procedures and treatments would be covered under such a plan. If the standard for the \u201cdecent minimum\u201d is set low, Buchanan argues that people should be allowed to spend additional money on a higher-quality healthcare plan if they please, no different from how people can choose to spend their money on other items, like fancy cars or other expensive items. This would mean that wealthier people would still have an advantage when it comes to healthcare. If the standard for the decent minimum is raised, there could potentially be a shortage of resources. <\/p>\n\n\n\n
While I understand the point he makes, I disagree with Buchanan\u2019s argument that healthcare is not a right. The US Constitution outlines Americans\u2019 rights to \u201clife, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.\u201d Does access to a basic level of healthcare not fall under the category of life? I don\u2019t necessarily believe that every non-essential or extremely expensive procedure should be covered under a standard form of healthcare provided to everyone, but some more commonplace procedures can be the difference between life and death.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
While I agree that people should be able to spend the money they earn however they please, I feel allowing people to pay for a more advantageous healthcare plan draws a huge gap between different groups in our society. The only way to prevent this problem is to ensure that the decent minimum encompasses any illness or condition that can be potentially life-threatening, even if it may be more expensive. Obviously a decent minimum cannot include everything, or it wouldn\u2019t be considered a minimum. However, it\u2019s important to note that there\u2019s a tremendous difference between not being able to afford a new car and not being able to afford cancer treatment, for example. While having the new car may be desirable and beneficial, not having this luxury is not immediately putting anybody at harm. Healthcare, on the other hand, can be a matter of life and death in many cases. <\/p>\n\n\n\n
Buchanan\u2019s point that there is no direct right to healthcare may be valid, but there is no denying that every American has a Constitutional right to life. Because certain procedures and treatments can save lives, denying a livable, decent minimum of healthcare is a right because it provides people with the means they need to live.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
In \u201cThe Right to a Decent Minimum of Health Care,\u201d Allen Buchanan begins by clarifying what constitutes something as a right. He explains that just because we can agree that people would benefit from having guaranteed healthcare, this doesn\u2019t mean that anybody has a true right to healthcare because there is no solid justice theory […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":7006,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[4,1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-162","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-healthcare-justice","category-uncategorized"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/scholarblogs.emory.edu\/bioethics116-4\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/162","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/scholarblogs.emory.edu\/bioethics116-4\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/scholarblogs.emory.edu\/bioethics116-4\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/scholarblogs.emory.edu\/bioethics116-4\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/7006"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/scholarblogs.emory.edu\/bioethics116-4\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=162"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/scholarblogs.emory.edu\/bioethics116-4\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/162\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":163,"href":"https:\/\/scholarblogs.emory.edu\/bioethics116-4\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/162\/revisions\/163"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/scholarblogs.emory.edu\/bioethics116-4\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=162"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/scholarblogs.emory.edu\/bioethics116-4\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=162"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/scholarblogs.emory.edu\/bioethics116-4\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=162"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}