For Big Ten rankings and a note on our methodology please click here.
For PAC-12 rankings please click here.
For ACC rankings please click here.
For Big 12 rankings please click here.
For SEC rankings please click here.
For Big East rankings please click here.
For the Best of the Rest click here.
While the college basketball season is far away, there are a number of interesting college basketball stories this summer. Our plan for June is to focus on college basketball issues. Our main focus will be on topics related to recruiting.
Our starting point, and the subject of today’s post, is a study of college basketball’s best fan bases. We posted this originally as we launched the site (so very few folks have seen the results). Fan bases relate to recruiting because they indicate enduring support from the fan base. We will follow this analysis of fan base quality with more commentary related to the Ed O’Bannon case, and then data on which schools produce the most NBA players after adjusting for recruiting success.
For our College Basketball Fan Equity analysis we use a “Revenue Premium” method. The intuition of this approach is that fan base quality is reflected in a school’s men’s basketball revenue relative to the team’s performance. To accomplish our analysis, we use a statistical model that predicts team revenues as a function of the team’s performance, as measured by winning rates and post season success. The key insight is that when a team achieves revenues that greatly exceed what would be expected based on team performance, it is an indication of significant brand equity. The analysis therefore avoids bandwagon effects and gets at the core loyal fan bases.
The table provides the top ten overall schools. Number one on the list also happens to be the most recent NCAA champion Louisville (note these ranking were computed prior to this past tournament). Louisville scores so well because they have a great tradition, and play in a decent sized metropolitan area that does not have any pro teams. The list does include many of the usual suspects such as Arizona, Duke and North Carolina. How does this relate to recruiting? Simple, strong fan bases equate to strong and high profile programs. If an athlete wants exposure and opportunities to play on a big stage, then it makes sense to seek out a high brand equity program. Of course, if the goal is to make it to the NBA, then this may or may not be the best strategy (we will get to this point as the NBA draft approaches).
One possible point of controversy is that Arkansas rates higher than Kentucky. The key is that while both Arkansas and Kentucky receive outstanding support, Arkansas’ support occurs despite less on-court success. The other possible interpretation is that Kentucky tends to underprice and may collect less revenues than possible.