David Bordwell’s essay “The Art Cinema as a Mode of Film Practice” explores the concept of art cinema and its distinct characteristics within the realm of film practice. Bordwell lays down several thought-provoking questions throughout the essay that encourage readers to consider the nature of art cinema and its impact/role in the broader cinematic landscape. Here are a couple of questions that he raises: 

What defines art cinema? Bordwell challenges readers to contemplate the elusive definition of art cinema, which often defies easy categorization. He raises the question of whether it is primarily defined by its stylistic choices, narrative strategies, or its emphasis on the director’s personal vision. This question prompts readers to think critically about the key features that distinguish art cinema from other film modes. 

How does art cinema challenge conventional storytelling? Bordwell delves into the ways in which art cinema disrupts traditional narrative structures, often favoring ambiguity and non-linear storytelling. He prompts readers to consider how these unconventional storytelling techniques contribute to the unique aesthetic and intellectual experience of art cinema. 

These questions encourage a deeper exploration of the complex nature and nuances of art cinema, making readers reflect on its significance in the cinematic landscape and its impact on storytelling and aesthetics in film.