{"id":57,"date":"2019-09-16T07:00:14","date_gmt":"2019-09-16T11:00:14","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/scholarblogs.emory.edu\/vulnerability\/?p=57"},"modified":"2019-09-23T09:56:42","modified_gmt":"2019-09-23T13:56:42","slug":"equality-and-difference-the-restrained-state","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/scholarblogs.emory.edu\/vulnerability\/2019\/09\/16\/equality-and-difference-the-restrained-state\/","title":{"rendered":"Equality and Difference – The Restrained State"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

by Martha Albertson Fineman<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
\"\"
image via<\/em> https:\/\/pixabay.com\/users\/walkerssk-1409366\/<\/em><\/a><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

“Contemporary American law, culture, and political theory restrain the concept of equality as a tool of social justice. Equality in conjunction with a strong emphasis on personal liberty operates as a mandate for curtailing state action, rather than an aspirational measure of the comparative well-being of individuals. As a check on state involvement, our cramped notion of equality limits the state\u2019s ability to affirmatively address economic, political, social, and structural inequalities. As interpreted in modern Supreme Court jurisprudence, the Equal Protection Clause of the U.S. Constitution actually works to restrict the remedial ability of the state. Equality is understood as a mandate for formalized equal treatment; it operates as a nondiscrimination ideal. This ideal minimizes existing structural disadvantages and thus impedes a more substantive approach to equality, which would recognize and accommodate differences and consider outcome as well as treatment. This formal version of equality, while appropriate on some levels and in some contexts, is not sufficiently flexible to address contemporary disparities in political, social, and economic well-being in America. Any distinctions in the treatment of individuals can raise suspicion about government action, and this is particularly true with distinctions involving personal characteristics that are virtually impossible to constitutionally justify, such as race or gender. At the same time, the emphasis on discrimination or difference in the treatment of protected individuals or groups has been viewed as the primary affront to the principle of equality, rather than the widespread (but nondiscriminatory) exclusion from the benefits of American prosperity and technological advancement experienced by those who stand outside as well as inside these protected identity categories. That generalized harm and deprivation is not seen as constituting a legally remedial form of inequality, indicates that an adherence to formal equality has seemingly eclipsed our moral and political aspirations for social justice. In effect, this means that the state and its actors and institutions can legally treat individuals poorly, just as long as they treat them the same.” <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Read more here: https:\/\/www.law.ua.edu\/pubs\/lrarticles\/Volume%2066\/Issue%203\/Fineman%20Online.pdf<\/a>. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

by Martha Albertson Fineman “Contemporary American law, culture, and political theory restrain the concept of equality as a tool of social justice. Equality in conjunction with a strong emphasis on personal liberty operates as a mandate for curtailing state action, rather than an aspirational measure of the comparative well-being of individuals. As a check on … Continue reading Equality and Difference – The Restrained State<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":6159,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-57","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/scholarblogs.emory.edu\/vulnerability\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/57","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/scholarblogs.emory.edu\/vulnerability\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/scholarblogs.emory.edu\/vulnerability\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/scholarblogs.emory.edu\/vulnerability\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/6159"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/scholarblogs.emory.edu\/vulnerability\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=57"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/scholarblogs.emory.edu\/vulnerability\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/57\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":67,"href":"https:\/\/scholarblogs.emory.edu\/vulnerability\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/57\/revisions\/67"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/scholarblogs.emory.edu\/vulnerability\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=57"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/scholarblogs.emory.edu\/vulnerability\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=57"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/scholarblogs.emory.edu\/vulnerability\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=57"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}