I did not expect to enjoy this film as much as I did. At first, I went in skeptical, but the more I watched, the more I was drawn in. Learning that the director had a background in physics definitely helped in giving me an extra layer of trust in the script, helping me be confident that the film was grounded in real thought.
What stood out the most was the way that art was used to explore scientific ideas. The artwork wasn’t there for aesthetics but was part of the storytelling, a way to create tension and curiosity. This mix of art and science, and the film, really comes to life and makes me think of experimenting with how to see knowledge.
Another thing I loved about it was that it took four years to make. That choice paid off because it allowed the story to capture the evolution of quantum computing from abstract ideas to the actual development of these computers in 2024. While the technology isn’t ready for everyday use, the film highlighted something about how creativity and imagination, even through art and nature, can inspire innovation and help us grasp concepts that might be impossible to think of out of the blue.
In the end, I was pleasantly surprised by how seamlessly the film bridged these worlds. Science doesn’t only advance in labs and equations, but grows through the world around you and human imagination.
Leave a Reply