Jordan Peele’s Nope was an intriguing multi-genre film that was not only entertaining but also full of historical and social commentary. When viewing Nope’s genres through a “reflectionist approach”, it becomes clear that they function together to tell a story about he history of Hollywood. Near the beginning of the movie, we see OJ and Emerald on a film set, surrounded by all white workers. While OJ tries to tell them about the safety precautions for the horse, they brush him off, ignoring his voice. Simultaneously, they ignore the needs of Lucky, not treating him like a real breathing animal but rather a prop. Emerald also tries to promote her directing and acting to he white audience but is not taken seriously. All of this highlights the exploitation of animals and marginalized groups throughout the history of Hollywood.

This is where the Western genre present in the film is so crucial to its message. Unlike the white-dominated industry, OJ has the ability to understand that the horses are worthy of respect as much as humans are because he understands them due to his job. He does not attempt to exploit them for the purpose of entertainment or a “spectacle” like Jupe.
However, while Jupe’s character functions as both an example of those who exploit and those who were exploited. This is where the horror genre comes into play. As a child actor, Jupe faced a traumatic experience on set which was then brushed under the rug- it was even flipped into a comical incident and put on SNL. It is clear throughout the film that this experience still affects him. However, possibly as a way to cope with it, he exploits the incident for money, charging tourists to enter the small museum he has built dedicated to it.

Finally, the idea of exploitation ties into the sci-fi genre of the film. At one point, OJ thinks back to how Lucky became aggravated when looked at and realized that also applied to the alien. Just as the horse had to be treated with respect on the film set, the alien could not be “domesticated” as Jupe tried to accomplish because he treated it as a prop without attempting to understand it. The idea that a catastrophe could be prevented if only you don’t look is analogous to how exploitation could be prevented if only people were not so eager to see a “spectacle”.

What are other examples of exploitation in the film? How does Peele combine genres to make other commentary about society? What is the significance of Jean Jacket?
Leave a Reply