1. I could create a podcast that is a historical reflection of the hoax itself. This could include the author, her article and its creation process, her accomplishments, the discovery of the hoax, and then the implications.
2. The second style could be focused more on the hoax itself. I could possibly read it, and have commentary on the hoax and its elements, and then add some reflection in towards the end rather than adding reflections on each step of the creation and revelation of the hoax.
I think either of these could work well–but before jumping in you’ll want to consider how would each be tailored to different audiences so that you can use strategies to call out to that specific audience.