Six History Honors Students Named Fox Center Fellows

The Fox Center for Humanistic Inquiry

Six undergraduate honors students from the Emory History Department are among the 2024-25 cohort of Undergraduate Humanities Honors Fellows at the Fox Center for Humanistic Inquiry. These fellowships support up to 12 students completing honors projects in a Humanities or Humanistic Social Science field. The goal of these Fellowships is to support undergraduates as they complete their theses, introduce them to the life of the Humanities, and provide a venue for interdisciplinary interchange, mentorship, and conference-style presentation. View short profiles of the students below and follow the links to more extended biographies.

Emilyn Hazelbrook is a senior majoring in history on the pre-law track. Her honors thesis project will map the trajectory of the battered woman legal defense from 1970 to 2000 in the United States.

>> Read More

Klaire Mason is a double major in history and creative writing. Her honors research will focus on opposition and repression leading up to Putin’s election to a third term and how it changed Russia’s trajectory.

>> Read More

Mercedes Sarah is a senior at Emory studying history and English & creative writing. Her honors thesis explores the Indigenous methodologies, the role of the archive, and oral history in the context of Indigenous California. 

>> Read More

Alex Minovici is a senior majoring in History and Philosophy, Politics, & Law. Her thesis explores how modern political engagement in democratic Romania is influenced by the memory of the 1989 Revolution.

>> Read More

Adelaide Rosene is a senior studying History with a minor in English. Her thesis project titled “Shadows of Exclusion: The Legacy of Sundown Towns In Wisconsin” examines how communities enforced racial segregation through policing and discrimination in housing.

>> Read More

Charlotte Weinstein is a senior majoring in History and minoring in Ethics. Her honors thesis explores the ideological shifts within the Czech and Slovak punk music scenes through political transition and the dissolution of Czechoslovakia in 1993.

>> Read More

Becky E. Herring Named Emory College Employee of the Year

On Thursday, August 15, 2024, at the College Staff Service Award Honoree Ceremony and New School Year Kickoff with speaker and host Emory College Dean Barbara Krauthamer, Becky E. Herring won the 2024 Emory College Employee of the Year Award. Seven letters of nomination were submitted for Becky, who serves as the History Department’s Senior Academic Department Administrator.

Herring with History Department faculty and staff and Dean Krauthamer after she won the award.

This college-wide award is designed to recognize one employee annually for outstanding contributions to Emory College. Any current college staff with 24 months of continuous service is eligible to be nominated for this award. The employee is selected based on job performance, interpersonal skills, and service to the Emory Community. Congratulations for this much deserved award, Becky!

New Books Series: Q&A with Maria R. Montalvo about ‘Enslaved Archives’


Dr. Maria R. Montalvo, Assistant Professor of History, recently published her first book, Enslaved Archives: Slavery, Law, and the Production of the Past, with Johns Hopkins University Press. The book explores the relationship between the production of enslaved property and the production of the past in the antebellum United States. Stephanie E. Jones-Rogers, Associate Professor of History at UC-Berkeley, described Montalvo’s work as “a profound ‘history within a history’ of slavery” and “a welcome, necessary addition to the study of the American slave trade.”

In the Q&A below, Dr. Montalvo gives us a glimpse into the making of the monograph as part of the History Department’s New Faculty Publications series.

Books are produced over years if not decades. Give us a sense for the lifespan of this book, from initial idea to final edits.

I started working on my book, in the form of a dissertation, in graduate school. If we count from the first time I set foot in the archive, then I started trying to figure out what I was going to write about in 2014. I like to think that I found my project in the archive, specifically, the New Orleans Public Library, which houses civil and criminal court records from New Orleans between 1803 and the 1920s. When I arrived, I knew I was interested in finding warranty disputes that centered on enslaved individuals, but I had no idea what it would take to find exactly what I was looking for or how my project would change during the looking. I don’t remember a specific lightbulb moment, when I knew exactly what I was doing or where it was all going. I remember a lot of little moments, alone with the lawsuits I’d found, in the library with friends and colleagues, or in my advisor’s office, when smaller things started to click and ideas began to come together. The book bears my name alone, but I did not write or conceive of it by myself. In the ten-year lifespan of putting this thing together, I’ve been able to lean on mentors, friends, editors, and colleagues. I couldn’t have written the book, or finally decided it was finished, on my own.

What was the research process like?

The research process was intense and time consuming. I looked through over 18,000 sets of civil court records while also trying to create a new, more efficient way of interacting with these sources. Sifting through thousands of court records took a lot of time and effort, as did closely reading the relevant ones and working to make sense of them. The result of all that time and effort is miles of notes and diary entries wherein my analysis began to take shape. Looking back, I’m glad I wrote down as much as I did about my process. It helped when it came to thinking through things, remembering what I’d seen in the archive, and of course, writing.

Are you partial to a particular chapter or section?

I think I’m partial to chapter one, which is and is not about an enslaved child named John. When I wrote my dissertation, I overlooked John, mentioning him, I think, 6 times in a chapter that he was not at the center of. I unwittingly brushed him aside in the interest of telling a more detailed story. And once I realized what I’d done, I wanted to see what it would mean to put John—someone who we find and lose in a single contract—at the center of his own history. The end result is not something that generates new biographical information about John, that’s unfortunately something we can’t do. But it is something that gets us closer to making sense of the world he lived in and the choices he may have believed he had.

How does this project align with your broad research agenda?

As a historian, I’m motivated by questions about how power is created, used, and preserved over time. My book centers on exploring the relationship between the production of enslaved property and violence, both historical and archival. In that way, it’s about the origins and extent of enslavers’ power over the people they enslaved. On the horizon, I see myself continuing to interrogate archival production as a means of understanding the entanglements of race, capitalism, and the freedom in the nineteenth-century United States.