Lit of the Week – Targeted Temperature Management (TTM)

Clinical question / background:

  • In patients with ROSC following cardiac arrest, does cooling patients to 33 degrees Celsius increase the rate of survival after resuscitation compared to cooling to 36 degrees Celsius?

Design:

  • Unblinded, parallel-group, randomized, controlled trial
  • 939 participants in 36 European and Australian centers
  • Inclusion criteria:
    • Witnessed arrest
    • Unconscious at presentation
    • Presumed cardiac origin of arrest
    • Age >18
    • More than 20 minutes of ROSC after resuscitation
  • Exclusion criteria:
    • No ROSC within 240 minutes of presentation
    • Unwitnessed arrest with initial rhythm of asystole
    • Suspected or known acute intracranial hemorrhage or stroke
    • Body temperature <30 degrees Celsius

 

Intervention:

  • Reduce core temperature (bladder temp) to 33 C or 36 C after ROSC. Maintain temperature goals for 28 hours, at which point allow for passive rewarming but maintain temperature below 37.5 C for 72 hours after ROSC

 

Control:

  • None

 

*Both groups sedated with for 36 hours after ROSC by providers’ sedation agents of choice.

 

Primary endpoint:

  • Mortality at the end of the trial

 

Secondary endpoints:

  • Favorable neurologic outcome at 180 days after cardiac arrest defined by Pittsburgh cerebral performance categories (CPC) (1 good recovery, 2 moderate disability, 3 severe disability, 4 vegetative state, 5 death) or the Modified Rankin Criteria (0 representing no symptoms, 1 no clinically significant disability, 2 slight disability, 3 moderate disability, 4 moderately severe disability, 5 severe disability, and 6 death.)
  • Mortality at 180 days

 

Results:

  • No difference in mortality at the end of the trial
    • 50% vs 48% (p=0.51)
  • No difference in neurologic outcome at 180 days
    • CPC 3-5: 54% vs 52% (p=0.78)
    • Modified Rankin 4-6: 52% vs 52% (p=0.87)
  • No difference in mortality at 180 days
    • 48% vs 47% (p=0.92)

 

Take-home:

  • No difference in mortality or neurologic outcomes in patients who are cooled to 33 C vs 36 C who present with witnessed arrest of presumed cardiac cause.

 

Weaknesses / Critiques

  • Unblinded
  • No control group
  • Took nearly 12 hours to cool patients in this trial, compared to 4-6 in previous trials
  • Possible that smaller subset of patients (i.e. those with initial shockable rhythm) could benefit from therapeutic hypothermia

 

Real World Application

  • Consider hospital protocol and patient’s characteristics before initiating therapeutic hypothermia

 

Additional information:

EMRAP October 2015 – Targeted Temperature Management 1 Year later

www.emrap.org/episode/october/october

 

Source:

Nielsen N, et al Targeted temperature management at 33°C versus 36°C after cardiac arrest. N Engl J Med. 2013 Dec 5;369(23):2197-206. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1310519. Epub 2013 Nov 17. PubMed PMID: 24237006.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.